[Posted
December 10, 2007]CYAVANA: Prabhupada, in the early fifties the scientists performed an experiment which substantiates their theory that life comes from matter, and they actually created a one-celled being. They made one cell which had life in it. It moved like an amoeba.
PRABHUPADA: Then why do they not do now? What is the wrong now?
CYAVANA: Well, they've done it. They can do it by creating certain conditions.
PRABHUPADA: But why do they not do?
CYAVANA: They use amino acids and water and electricity.
PRABHUPADA: Bluffing.
CYAVANA: But this gave great strength to their theory that life can come from matter because they created a one-celled amoeba. They say they created it, that life actually came into it.
PRABHUPADA: They said everything, but where is the proof?
CYAVANA: Well, the scientists saw it.
PRABHUPADA: Saw it? Now show us.
CYAVANA: They put the chemicals, and then it moved. It became alive.
PRABHUPADA: All rascals.
YADUBARA: In so many years they haven't done anything else.
PRABHUPADA: Just see.
CYAVANA: No, that's as far as they got, but it really boosted their theory, at least so that they thought they would be able to create life.
PRABHUPADA: All rascals.
DAYANANDA: There's also a scientific argument against that, that there may have been the life conditions or the conditions conducive to life, so therefore life came, but not that that was produced by chemical combination. Just like they're actually opposing that argument, scientific school that opposes the idea that they actually produced the life itself.
CYAVANA: Some of them said the life was already there in the water to begin with.
PRABHUPADA: In the water, life there is; in the air, in.... That is another thing. But life is different from the water. That is our proposal.