---

---

Letters

Reconstituted Milk - Not Authentic

Das devi dasi 3 Feb 2007

Comment Send this story to a friend printer friendly page

To: Nathan Zakheim <zakheim@earthlink.net>, Patrick Hedemark <pdhedemark@yahoo.com>, Nimai Pandit Das <nimaipandit@yahoo.com>
From: Diane Marie Chan <daschan@pop.jaring.my>
Subject: Re: Prabhupadanugas Press

Hare Krishna
Dear NNV Prabhu, all obeisances for you, all glories to Srila Prabhupada.

NNV wrote:
ONCE AGAIN. THE BENEFICIARY (ISKCON INC) IS THE INJURED PARTY AND LEGALLY ELIGIBLE TO HAVE THE COURT RE-CONSTITUTE ITS BENEFACTOR, THE BBT.

Interesting choice of wording, Prabhu. But why does the BBT require to be "re-constituted"? What exactly do you mean by this? Do you mean change the trustees? Or do you mean perhaps something more than this?

We also want to know your reply to Praghosa's question:

At 9:03 -0800 2/2/07, Patrick Hedemark wrote:
DO YOU ACCEPT HANS KARY AKA HANSADUTTA DAS AS THE LEGITIMATE - IN THE EYES OF HIS DIVINE GRACE SRILA PRABHUPADA - TRUSTEE FOR LIFE OF THE BHAKTIVEDANTA BOOK TRUST?

It is a valid question. It seems to me that if you did, you would be working with the Trustee very closely. But your undertaking so far is ex parte, i.e. serving the interests of the alleged beneficiary, not necessarily those of the BBT.

Your fallen servant, das dd

Reconstituted Milk/ Inside Nam Hatta

© 2007 - Hansadutta dasa

World Sankirtan Party

Home | About | Events | World Sankirtan Party | Inside Nam Hatta
eBooks | View Site Map | Store

Essays, Editorials