To:
Nathan Zakheim <zakheim@earthlink.net>, Patrick Hedemark
<pdhedemark@yahoo.com>, Nimai Pandit Das
<nimaipandit@yahoo.com>
From: Diane Marie Chan <daschan@pop.jaring.my>
Subject: Re: Prabhupadanugas Press
Hare Krishna
Dear NNV Prabhu, all obeisances for you, all glories to Srila
Prabhupada.
NNV
wrote:
ONCE AGAIN. THE BENEFICIARY (ISKCON INC) IS THE INJURED PARTY AND
LEGALLY ELIGIBLE TO HAVE THE COURT RE-CONSTITUTE ITS BENEFACTOR, THE
BBT.
Interesting
choice of wording, Prabhu. But why does the BBT require to be
"re-constituted"? What exactly do you mean by this? Do you mean change
the trustees? Or do you mean perhaps something more than this?
We also want to know your reply to Praghosa's question:
At
9:03 -0800 2/2/07, Patrick Hedemark wrote:
DO YOU ACCEPT HANS KARY AKA HANSADUTTA DAS AS THE LEGITIMATE - IN THE
EYES OF HIS DIVINE GRACE SRILA PRABHUPADA - TRUSTEE FOR LIFE OF THE
BHAKTIVEDANTA BOOK TRUST?
It
is a valid question. It seems to me that if you did, you would be
working with the Trustee very closely. But your undertaking so far is
ex parte, i.e. serving the interests of the alleged beneficiary, not
necessarily those of the BBT.
Your fallen servant, das dd
