
HANSADUTTA: The thing is that my experience is since a long, long time, whenever I run across someone who is a fanatic—or whom I consider a fanatic, anyway—first of all, they are not receptive. Their whole mind set is to block everything which does not support or agree with whatever their conviction is or whatever their belief is. It's not really a conviction; it's a belief that they have embraced without logic, reason and argument and philosophy or even authoritative shastras or disciplic succession. In other words, they just embrace something out of desperation, because it's a living being's nature to take shelter in something, something supreme. But because there is no disciplic succession, no logic, no reason, no argument, no philosophy... and the book itself is about... I mean, who set down the words? Therefore, it's just a waste of time to try to deal with these people. The best thing is to encourage them. You say, "You follow Jesus? Then follow. That's fine." Because you'll aggravate them, and you'll aggravate yourself and wind up wasting time, and people will see us as antagonists, as competitors.
And I also don't really agree with the Interfaith idea where you kind of placate or patronize them, thinking thereby you are going to win them over. Just like policemen going to a den of thieves and trying to... it doesn't make any sense thinking you are going to convert them. They are fixed in a certain mind set which has very little substance, and out of desperation they cling to that. The more reason and
arguments you present, the more they become desperate. And you cannot
deal with a person who is in desperation.
Our position is: "Here are the Vedic literatures. They have their own
intrinsic value. In other words, their authority and validity, their
antiquity speak for themselves, and if you are interested, we can
explain." But as soon as someone wants to argue, it's just like...
we're not here to argue. It's like going to the doctor and then you
start arguing with him. Or going to the university and arguing with the
professor. The professor says, "If you want to learn, you do the work.
Otherwise, go home." We should not enter into argument. It's a
different thing when someone is talking with you, and he wants to know,
but at certain points he gets stuck and asks, "Hey, well, what about
this?" and he puts his doubts forward. That's a different thing. But
people who have lock, stock and barrel embraced so-called Christianity
and see everyone else as an infidel or whatever... their need is to
protect themselves. Otherwise, as soon as they admit one... as soon as
they admit you into one point... like meat eating, for example, it says
"Thou shalt not kill." They say that refers to killing people, not
animals. As soon as they allow themselves to entertain one point that
you may be right, they'll collapse, and they cannot collapse, because
this is all they have, and you're too far out for them so that they
cannot see themselves like this—free-wheeling souls, not being the body
and embracing Krishna, who appears to them... from what they have heard
from their teachers, He is the devil himself.
SITHU: It's just like that quote you were saying from Bhagavad-gita, "Let not the wise disturb the ignorant."
HANSADUTTA: Yes, don't try to disturb them. It's not a good policy. If
someone wants to hear, that's different. Just like you were at that
office with a Buddhist man, and he had a gold-plated altar, but he
wanted to know about Krishna. He wanted to know. He was curious and
interested. Such a person you can... and even then you have to be very
cautious how you present. Although we take these things for granted...
I mean, we are literally liberated, free-wheeling spirits. We don't
think of ourselves that way, but in comparison to the people you are
dealing with, we are like men from the moon. We have awesome
convictions—we are not this body, we will be born again, wherever and
whatever your mind is thinking at the time of death, you go there, karma
and Krishna, Krishna lila and on and on... chanting Hare
Krishna and eating prasadam, the Gopis, Lord Chaitanya. We have
such a vast panorama of transcendental lore and philosophy, it just
staggers them. They cannot fathom. Just telling someone that he's not
the body is like... that is a big thing. Or tell him that you are
celibate or vegetarian. "How do you live?!" So you have to keep that in
mind when you're dealing with people.
SITHU: So not everybody is ready for Krishna consciousness?
HANSADUTTA: No, no, because—
SITHU: How do you know who's ready for what?
HANSADUTTA: As you come in touch with the public, friends, relatives
and people you've never seen before, you will learn by just being very
observant about how your words affect them. You will learn to read
people. And after they have said one sentence, two sentences, you will
know where they are. Prabhupada oftentimes asked, "So what is your
philosophy?" And no one... there is nothing a person likes more than to
get a chance to tell you what his philosophy is. So it's a good thing
to do. "Hey, what's your name? Where do you come from? Oh, you're from
Singapore? That's nice. What's your... you know, so what's your
philosophy?" Without having to tell him what yours is, and that person
will tell you what his philosophy is. And then, it's up to you to
decide how to deal with that person, how to present, or if you even
want to attempt to present. And that takes practice. There are really
no formulas.
But one thing you should always remember is that unless a person... unless you can actually bring a person to the understanding that he is not the body and that he is the soul within the body and give very graphic, concrete, simple but concrete examples which he can see and understand—"Okay, I got it!"—unless that happens, there is not much use in telling him anything else. Like Christians, for example, I don't think they understand they are not the body. They don't ever think of it. It's amazing. It's such a simple thing, and yet no one ever comes to that very specific distinction—"I am not the body, I am the soul, and therefore, because I am not the body, I shouldn't waste my time." For us it's very simple,
but for most people it's a very, very far out thing to deal with.
SITHU: Christians believe they have a soul.
HANSADUTTA: Well, the Christians have one concept, at least one group
does, that you go in the grave at some time there is a rapture and
everybody comes out of the grave and goes up into the air.
SITHU: What about reincarnation in the Bible? We could point that out
to people.
HANSADUTTA: How do you tell people? They don't have... you see,
Christianity first of all has one book, and in that book very little is
really intelligent. I read the Bible, and I can't make heads or tails
of what is going on with this book! [laughing] The gospels, Ecclesiastics... And I don't know how many people have interpreted what Revelations means. They make these sitcoms and make a lot of money over it.
The
best thing is really not to enter into it, because you're only giving them credibility where they don't really have any credibility. It's like bickering over change with a counterfeiter. [laughing] A man is buying everything with counterfeit money, and you're bickering over change. It's all counterfeit. It has no real substance. You can't deal with it. It just doesn't have any
disciplic succession. I mean, who is in the disciplic succession of
Jesus? If I ask any Christian, "Well, who is your apostle? Who baptized
you? Who initiated you? And who initiated them? And show me how he goes
back to Jesus? Show me how he's one of those 12 disciples or eleven or
whatever." There's not a man on this earth who could tell you that. So
what are we dealing with? Do you understand? It's best not to disturb
them. Leave them be and encourage them, "You follow Jesus? You follow
him. Great. We're not competing. We are simply teaching this. If you're
interested, we can discuss. But if you want to argue, we don't want to
argue. We accept Jesus, and we are glad that you follow Jesus, and we
follow Jesus, too. But we also follow Krishna. And whatever Jesus
taught is there in Krishna, but there are other things. If you are
interested, then we can talk, but we are not even going to argue. That
would be a waste of time."
SITHU: Mental block.
HANSADUTTA: Yes. We have to make people understand, that's all. Not by
arguing or overwhelming them with our wisdom or quotes or whatever, but
by statements which they can understand. And when you see you are
dealing with someone who cannot, no matter what you say, who is seeing
you as the devil... I know, because I was in Berkeley in the '60's, and
there were so many new-age, born-again Christian groups roaming all
over like bandits, and they'd just like come upon you, "You've got the
devil in your heart, brother. Do you accept Jesus?" [laughter] Yes,
they see everybody as the devil, and so whatever you say is just
confirming what they are seeing. If you say, "It's a nice day," they're
going to see that you are full of hell brimstone and hell fire. What we
used to do in Berkeley when these groups would come upon us... we'd be
out there doing sankirtan, and all of a sudden one guy—his name
was Hubert, a red-haired, completely freckled face which looked like
somebody threw a handful of mud on him—he just started raving about the
devil and so on. So I took a kirtan party and called all the
collectors back and we would just go around that person and have kirtan
so loud that you couldn't hear a single word he said. It was like he
was in a silent movie. And people would see it and understand that this
guy is bonkers. And after some time, he disappeared. But I would never
argue with him. We found in Sri Lanka... the Buddhists here are
different, but the Sri Lanka Buddhists are so unresponsive. I mean, you
could be talking to that chair. They are totally into zero, and they
want to be there. "You are in a wrong understanding." That was their
famous line.
SITHU: Dry hearts.
HANSADUTTA: Yes.
SITHU: Completely dried out.
HANSADUTTA: In Srimad-Bhagavatam it explains that the
hearer must be enthusiastic to hear, and the speaker must be
enthusiastic to speak, and the combination of these two enthusiasts—one
who wants to hear and one who wants to speak—Krishna manifests there.
Like a match and a striker—fire will come. They have to have some...
like that lady, we went to that lady's house. Ordinary lady, but she
wants. People were coming, and they had some willingness to hear. And
we wanted to chant and tell something about Krishna. And it was a very
nice program. When that is repeated, after some years, that lady... who
knows where that lady will be? Maybe her whole house will be full of
"Krishnas" and "Prabhupadas" [deities of Krishna and Prabhupada]. You see?
It's a gradual process of culturing devotion, and it depends on
association with devotees. Association with devotees.
All the devotees, in the early days, were made by close association. A
devotee would just... once he latched onto you, he would just badger
you until you either gave up or ran away. They were just totally into
it. Like the Sunday Feast. It was a tactic that when a guest came,
every devotee would zero in on him, sit down next to that person, and
some people became devotees. Some people didn't. Association, by
association. Sometimes moving in with people. Always association.
But the whole Interfaith thing immediately gives the Christians a
certain credence which they actually don't deserve, a certain
credibility which they don't have and don't deserve. And when you give
it to them, you're just defeating yourself. Like a cop giving a robber
a gun. I find it self-defeating. I think it's best to—
BHIMA: Paramahamsa and others were really into it with this Indian
tribe or something. They were smoking pipes and using the sweat lodge.
HANSADUTTA: Just like in school there are different classes. There are
kindergarten, grade school, junior high, high school, university. You
cannot expect all students to be in one class, in one school. You have
got to have distinctions that this person, okay, let him be in a sweat
lodge, but I don't want, why should I go into the sweat lodge? He needs
to be there, but I don't need to be there. Leave him there. Not
everyone can take up Krishna consciousness. Prabhupada said that. Not
everyone. It's for a highly intelligent person who is prepared. Not
everybody.
SITHU: [inaudible]
HANSADUTTA: Yes. The whole Interfaith thing... they drift so far from
the standard thing that after a while you can't tell what is what
anymore. It's not good for the newcomer, and it's not good for the
person who is doing it, and it's not what Prabhupada taught us to do.
He was like "Take it or leave it." Like a gold merchant. He has his
shop, and if you want to buy gold, "This is the price. If you can go
somewhere else and get it cheaper, let me know, and I'll buy some too."
That's what Krishna consciousness is. It's standard. It's a standard
science, and it is backed by logic, reason, argument, authority of shastras and disciplic succession. Sadhu, guru, shastras. And if we subject ourselves to all these vague, sentimental, fanatic, unauthorized
faiths, we're just defeating ourselves. We shouldn't expect hundreds of
followers. There are so many Christian groups, but what is their
platform of association? Do they follow any principles? Do they refrain
from meat, fish, eggs? Do they give up intoxicants? Are they free from
illicit sex and gambling? Do they get up early in the morning and chant
16 rounds? And if not, then why do you want to give them so much... you
call it Interfaith, but you are putting yourself in their orbit.
SITHU: So it's like you said if a person goes to buy gold and someone
offers him a cheaper price.
HANSADUTTA: Right. How can it be? You should know right away there's
something wrong. Gold is gold. I don't have to sell it. I've got it. If
you don't want it, it's okay, but I have gold, so I'm okay. I'm
offering to share with you. We should always remember that our... in
other words, we are not... we cannot offer someone Krishna
consciousness at a discount, like gurus initiating people for
two rounds. Where does that come from? [laughing] Discount.
SITHU: I think people would appreciate this if they only knew what it
really is, but what they've seen of Krishna devotees here scares them
off, because they can't see themselves that way, their lives don't
fit...
HANSADUTTA: There is a way to present, and that is the... Prabhupada
said art, the art of preaching. And he gave the example of two men
going to the same medical school, same professor, same books,
everything same. They graduate, and one opens a practice here, one
opens a practice there. Now one man's office is always full of
patients, and the other man has no patients. Why? He said it was the
art of applying medicine. Just to know the books, the textbook is not
enough. There's an art, and that art cannot be learned from the book.
That art is learned by practice. And we must learn the art of
presenting our conclusions without diluting them, so that people can
accept them. People who are normally unwilling to accept them will
accept them. That is what the art of preaching is all about. Not that
we have to camouflage our conclusions and feign appreciation for
conclusions which are bogus just to get near. That's not the way. Like
Prabhupada, he was uncompromising, and yet he attracted us, because he
knew the art. He knows the art, and our business is to learn the art
how to do it. And that comes by practice. And that means you make
mistakes. You go out there and say something, and the guy will get
blown away. But we are practicing. We are practicing preaching Krishna
consciousness.
I think now that we have done so many things, at the airport,
collecting money and done all kinds of things, I mean ultimately it
always comes down to a one-to-one experience. I like to go to people's
homes. I like to go and chant Hare Krishna, explain a little something,
distribute prasadam and chant a little more. That is very,
very... I mean, who ever comes to anybody's home except...? I mean, who
ever comes into someone's home? Maybe in Singapore they do, but like a
robot coming there, watching your family members, or your relatives—and
your relatives don't come. People generally don't come. And especially
like we are, chanting and speaking something spiritual. That's a very,
very intense and powerful experience, and when that is repeated on a
regular basis, that will transform people. And as they grow, in time
their faith will grow so that they will think of conducting the meeting
and inviting or going to someone else. In other words, it will spill
over. But let's face it. It's small. Prabhupada... his coming and
moving through the world was something we will never, never see the
likes of again. And he captured all the far-out people. He just
captured them and sent them off. But we have to deal with people in
this way. We have to deal with them in their own castle or on their own
ground and somehow or other bring them to light. Occasionally there
will be some devotees who are not... they don't have any wife or
children, and they will join and be brahmacharis and make their
life a life of teaching, or preaching Krishna consciousness. But for
the most part, people will stay where they are. They will stay where
they are, and gradually. Although it sounds slow, it has tremendous
potential, because every person has a circle of friends and associates
that he must deal with, and if every person can affect one other
person, that's already big.
SITHU: That will double the effect.
HANSADUTTA: Yes, because that person also has his own circle, and he
inevitably will affect them. And it all depends on how we deal with the
original people, the original group. How we deal with them. If we are
consistent, if we maintain purity, and if we artfully awaken them to
Krishna consciousness. Just like a match. One match can bring down the
whole forest. That's all it takes. Prabhupada was one person.
Prabhupada was one single person. And he had twelve very fired-up,
dedicated men—his GBC men, who were for the most part householders. I think with the exception of Tamal and one or two others. Anyway, there were just one or two who were brahmacharis and sannyasis. These
twelve people went to different parts of the world. I went to Germany,
Madhudvisa went to Australia, Sudama went to Japan, Tamal was in India,
Shyamasundar was in Europe. They expanded the mission. And that same
principle holds true today.
Right now, most of the activity that this movement concerns itself with
is getting money. Like Sundar... it's only money. He's not really
concerned with teaching anyone Krishna consciousness. He knows the
philosophy and arguments, and he can roll it off the tip of his tongue,
but that's not what preaching is. Preaching is a deep, heartfelt
concern for the person, just like Das looks after the baby. She is
totally conscious of that baby. As soon as that baby makes a peep, Das
is alert, wondering, "What's happening there?" A tooth is coming in, or
temperature goes up a little bit, and she is completely aware. And
preaching means to be completely aware of that person's existence,
internal and external, and to bring him to life. That's what preaching
is. The easiest part of preaching is to explain. The hard part is
actually to... just like he just thought about having a baby and
impregnating a woman. Well, anyone can do that. But when the baby comes
out, then that's where the work begins. So once you come in touch with
someone and he wants to hear about Krishna, that's nice. But as they
begin to awaken to it and respond, you have to be available so that
they don't fall back and slide back.