Many thanks to Madhudvisa das for posting extensive documentation of the changes made to Srila Prabhupada's books: Bhagavad-gita As It Is, Perfect Questions, Perfect Answers, Krishna Book and Chaitanya-charitamrita at krishna.org/ISKCON/BookChanges/. The original text is laid out on the left and the revised edition on the right, with color mark-up indicating changes, additions, subtractions, making it easy to compare. Ingenious (how did he do it?).
Looking over the
changes made to Chaitanya-charitamrita alone, it is at
once apparent that they are too numerous to count. Most appear to be corrections to typos, spelling, and touching up grammar, but in many cases, the
editors have altered the meaning of the original text significantly.
We're aware that a number of devotees gloss over changes to typos, spelling and grammar. "What's wrong with that?" they argue. It might seem petty to
object to those kinds of corrections, but the corrections in the first
place are just that: so petty that one wonders how they are justifiable.
Justifiable is not a word that can be used for changes beyond typos, spelling and grammar. What possible acceptable rationale can there be for changes affecting the meaning of the translations and purports, whether subtraction, addition or substitution?
What's going on in
the minds of the editors? They have cast Srila Prabhupada's words in
doubt: "Why did Srila Prabhupada say that? Did he perhaps not know what he was
talking about? It can't be right" or "I can say it better," or "he left
it out" or "he's dead wrong." Is this not the editors' frame of mind?
ISKCON stands by Jayadvaita Swami, expecting the devotees should be grateful that the editors are so intelligent that they can correct the spiritual master's
mistakes, but the upshot is that whoever reads the revised books will
have to wonder what Srila Prabhupada really did say.
It has been pointed out that any corrections to typos, spelling and grammar could be given in footnotes or mentioned on an errata page at the end of the chapter. But Jayadvaita Swami's revisions are slipped quietly, seamlessly and insidiously into Srila Prabhupada's books so that unaware and unsuspecting readers will believe these are the words of Srila Prabhupada.
The result is poison. Arsenic mixed into food or drink cannot be detected, because it is colourless and tasteless, but its effect is lethal. Srila Prabhupada's vani has been poisoned. Instead of
clarity, we end up with confusion and doubt, undermining the credibility and authority of Srila Prabhupada's books, jeopardising the siddhanta.
A sampling of changes below: — (blue text indicates the
original text which has been changed; red text
indicates the revised)
Original
Cc
Adi Lila Chapter 5, Text 78 Text
78 SYNONYMS TRANSLATION
Revised
Cc Adi Lila Chapter 5, Text 78 TEXT
78 SYNONYMS TRANSLATION Who is correct? Srila Prabhupada or Jayadvaita? Read Srila Prabhupada's purport to Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.3.2 and 1.3.5 and decide for yourself. But maybe first you'd better verify that the Srimad-Bhagavatam you're reading is the original, unrevised edition. |
Original
Cc Adi
Lila Chapter 5, Text 80 TEXT
80 SYNONYMS TRANSLATION
Revised
Cc Adi Lila Chapter 5, Text 80 TEXT
80 SYNONYMS TRANSLATION See note above — readers will have to verify which translation is correct by referring to Srimad-Bhagavatam. |
Original
Cc Madhya Lila Chapter 22, Text 43 TEXT SYNONYMS TRANSLATION [No purport given]
Revised
Cc Madhya Lila Chapter 22,
Text 43 TEXT
43 SYNONYMS TRANSLATION PURPORT In this instance, Srila Prabhupada's original translation has become a purport, and Jayadvaita has come up with his own translation. |
Original
Cc Madhya Lila Chapter 19, purport to Text 152
Bhakti-lata-bija can be received only through the mercy of the spiritual master. Therefore one has to satisfy the spiritual master to get bhakti-lata-bija (yasya prasadad bhagavat-prasadah). Bhakti-lata-bija is the origin of devotional service. Unless one satisfies the spiritual master, he gets the bija, or root cause, of karma, jnana and yoga without the benefit of devotional service. However, one who is faithful to his spiritual master gets the bhakti-lata-bija. This bhakti-lata-bija is received when one is initiated by the bona fide spiritual master. After receiving the spiritual master's mercy, one must repeat his instructions, and this is called sravana-kirtana—hearing and chanting. One who has not properly heard from the spiritual master or who does not follow the regulative principles is not fit for chanting (kirtana). This is explained in Bhagavad-gita (2.41): vyavasayatmika buddhir ekeha kuru-nandana. One who has not listened carefully to the instructions of the spiritual master is unfit to chant or preach the cult of devotional service. One has to water the bhakti-lata-bija after receiving instructions from the spiritual master.
Revised
Cc Madhya Lila Chapter 19, purport to Text 152 The bhakti-lata-bija can be received only through the mercy of the spiritual master. Therefore one has to satisfy the spiritual master to get the bhakti-lata-bija (yasya prasadad bhagavat-prasadah). The bhakti-lata-bija is the origin of devotional service. Unless one satisfies the spiritual master, he gets the bija, or root cause, of karma, jnana and yoga without the benefit of devotional service. But one who is faithful to his spiritual master gets the bhakti-lata-bija. This bhakti-lata-bija is received when one is initiated by the bona fide spiritual master. After receiving the spiritual master's mercy, one must repeat his instructions, and this is called sravana-kirtana—hearing and chanting. One who has not properly heard from the spiritual master or who does not follow the regulative principles is not fit for chanting (kirtana). This is explained in the Bhagavad-gita (2.41): vyavasayatmika buddhir ekeha kuru-nandana. One who has not listened carefully to the instructions of the spiritual master is unfit for chanting or for preaching the cult of devotional service. One has to water the bhakti-lata-bija by receiving instructions from the spiritual master. Interesting how the single word by can change the meaning of a purport. |
Original Cc Madhya Lila
Chapter
19, purport to Text 157
If one thinks that there are many pseudo devotees or nondevotees in the Krsna Consciousness Society, one can keep direct company with the spiritual master, and if there is any doubt, one should consult the spiritual master. However, unless one follows the spiritual master's instructions and the regulative principles governing chanting and hearing the holy name of the Lord, one cannot become a pure devotee.
Revised
Cc Madhya Lila Chapter 19, purport to Text 157 Even if one thinks that there are many pseudo devotees or nondevotees in the Krsna Consciousness Society, still one should stick to the Society; if one thinks the Society members are not pure devotees, one can keep direct company with the spiritual master, and if there is any doubt, one should consult the spiritual master. However, unless one follows the spiritual master's instructions concerning the regulative principles and chanting and hearing the holy name of the Lord, one cannot become a pure devotee. In this one paragraph there are 2 significant changes to the original text on the left. Firstly, Jayadvaita has inserted "still one should stick to the Society". Srila Prabhupada has not said this at all. Secondly, Srila Prabhupada stresses the importance of following the spiritual master's instructions and the regulative principles that govern chanting and hearing the holy name of the Lord. What are those principles governing chanting and hearing? Again, Jayadvaita changes the meaning, saying that one must follow the spiritual master's instructions concerning the regulative principles (readers will assume he's referring to the 4 regs) and chanting and hearing the holy name of the Lord.] |